Skip to content

My Dream Book

February 28, 2012
Dreams

Abstract games are at their best when players take the time to learn and share strategy, and though we’re in the middle of an abstract-game-design renaissance, even some of the best modern abstracts remain strategic mysteries.

So I have this dream: a book featuring 10 of the best abstract games designed this millenium, with say, 30-40 pages worth of strategy discussion for each.

How to choose the 10? If it were up to me, I’d limit the candidates to games without chance, and I’d focus on games with good “architecture”, meaning games which are finite (or likely soft-finite), balanced, decisive, conceptually “unified”, and with the simplest of rules and equipment.

The only game that would be a lock for inclusion for me is Slither. Hex Oust should probably also be in there, along with Arimaa, and Tzaar, IMO the one profound game from the Gipf Project. I’d love to include Quoridor as well, but sadly the published version is from 1997, and there’s an unpublished version which predates that by decades.

Beyond that I don’t know. No doubt there’d be a lot of arguing about which games should be included. I can already hear my fellow designer Mark Steere groaning about Tzaar.

It would take a loooooong time to put together such a book, because there would have to be an effort to develop strategy for each game before writing anything, and most of the games don’t have much recorded strategy (except for Arimaa, which already has its own whole book, and Hex Oust, which has a little online strategy guide to start from). Perhaps the effort could be made in collaboration, with the designers and best players of each game contributing the ideas, and the author/editor focusing on presentation and language.

If I were writing the book, I’d also include one of my own games even if it doesn’t deserve to be there; if I’m going to the trouble I’m gonna reward myself for it. (Self-Indulgent Bonus Chapter, I’d call it)

Anyway this is all a daydream because I don’t know how to frame the idea to attract a wide audience. It’s not worth pursuing without a plan to solve that problem. I’d love to get suggestions in the comments about how to do it.

One thing of which I’m certain: I’d make sure the language was uber-understandable and non-technical. I’d make sure that an uninformed 14-year-old could read it without breaking a sweat. I wouldn’t go deep into strategy esoterica, but rather focus on the big, defining concepts for each game.

I’d also make it funny because there’s never a reason not to be funny.

Perhaps the book could be launched in conjunction with a year-long tournament with prizes for the winners at the end, administered through the igGameCenter. The designers of the featured games could be asked to contribute to the prize-hopper to defray costs.

On the off chance that this post generates a lot of interest, I might get serious about exploring the possibility, so if you’re interested, let me and world know in the comments.

Advertisements

From → Essays

9 Comments
  1. Mark Steere permalink

    No doofy quips.

  2. Xifeng permalink

    I would be very interested in something like this. I’ve become frustrated with how quickly we as a community design games and how little they get explored. It kinda broke my heart when my game, which I solved a week after I posted it, made finalist in that big contest.I’ve stopped designing games for a while because of that, and I’ve been focusing more on exploring the games that are closest to my heart. I would submit Cephalopod without hesitation, but in many of the other newer games that I love I just can’t find opponents who will really challenge my ideas.I hope that the stars align to make this actually happen. It would be a very exciting project to watch take shape.

  3. Nick Bentley permalink

    Xifeng,I agree the contest was lame. But to be fair to it, most other game design contests are as well. When you have 100 submissions to evaluate, you can give no serious attention to any one of them. The only thing that matters is the first impression. Anyway, I got no great rush of interest for this idea outside a couple of us hardcore abstract lovers. Unless that happens, it’s DOA.

  4. tessman permalink

    Why a book? It seems to me, a web site would be better for this, and it could be done incrementally.

  5. DrFriendless permalink

    I would totally buy that book.

  6. Do not forget on Connect6. Look on my comment here about depth of Connect6 played on Little Golem: http://boardgamegeek.com/thread/635637/which-game-is-deeper-which-feels-deeper

    And popularity of iPhone game is high too: http://appshopper.com/games/connect-6

    • nickbentley1000 permalink

      So very true. Though I’ve heard it can be draw-prone at high level play. true?

  7. I’ve recently got into designing abstracts and your book is a wonderful idea. A blog, wiki. We could work out a way for all of us to play.

  8. nickbentley1000 permalink

    I failed to mention: I actually started a strategy blog after writing this post (not just for abstract games but for all games), but since then it has languished because my time is stretched in too many directions and I had to drop some things. When I started it, it received way more traffic than I expected it to. I would love to get collaborators to keep the dream alive while I’m busy. Here’s the site: http://www.boardgamestrategies.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: